Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
81. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Alp Khan wrote: who claimed to be an alt of a sovereign null resident citation please? Oh right, I never said such a thing. Nice point though, really helped the discussion. so you are asserting that you don't actually l...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 23:47:41
|
82. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: Veskrashen wrote: Tycho VI wrote: And then you start using Trollvipuls :P Trollvipuls don't insta-align and can't ignore bubbles. Therefore according to Gewns they're absolutely in no way shape or form imbalanced. Anythi...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 23:43:45
|
83. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Acuma wrote: in an UNUSED system lol deklein is the most-used 0.0 region in the game Then you have nothing to worry about from a lone "trollceptor." sure we do if we don't send disproportionat...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 23:40:35
|
84. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote: Alavaria Fera wrote: a ceptor is capable of denying you "effective military control of the grid" so where's the problem? literally shut the f**k up, you're actually more annoying the xenuria. oof, forums burn...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 23:21:10
|
85. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
KIller Wabbit wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: also fyi the timer can only be 40 minutes if the system has an industrial index of 5 there are no regions in the game with an average industrial index above one except providence That is the...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 23:20:22
|
86. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Arthur Aihaken wrote: baltec1 wrote: For the love of god do not allow us such a tool because we will abuse it and make life for everyone else miserable. I think if one were to take only one thing out of the discus...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 23:10:07
|
87. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: in an UNUSED system lol deklein is the most-used 0.0 region in the game
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:56:17
|
88. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
you can see a mirror of this posting style in the old 2012 era Faction Warfare posts where the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal repeatedly warned CCP that their LP formula was inherently flawed they didn't listen and the mechanic went in unmolest...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:53:25
|
89. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mike Azariah wrote: OK, I had to go back to the start to remember what this thread is about. Imagine my surprise when it wasn't interceptors. Oh, they were mentioned Quote: This is the other side of the coin. In practice it means that we sh...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:50:30
|
90. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: You've yet to show why a sniper corm won't kill an Inty, thus you have no legs to stand on. the interceptor burns out of the sniper cormorant's ridicuously tiny window of effective damage application it has the time to ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:46:31
|
91. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Veskrashen wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Veskrashen wrote: Since the only significant advantage they have over cloaky nullfiied T3s is their <=2sec align time this just in signatu...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:42:22
|
92. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: Acuma wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Acuma wrote: Seems mostly that only the goonies are afraid of trollceptors....... argumentum ad populum Not really, since most of Eve isn't goonies. Do you wanna try to ref...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:40:00
|
93. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
God's Apples wrote: Lemme break it down. There are 5 objectives. You have 50 dudes. The enemy has a 250 man interceptor fleet. You break your gang into 5 sub-units of the comp I describe above. Each sub-unit defends one objective. If the enemy ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:37:26
|
94. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: Not really, since most of Eve isn't goonies. Do you wanna try to refute facts or just divert? that is not what argumentum ad populum means
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:35:23
|
95. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: M1k3y Koontz wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: M1k3y Koontz wrote: https://i.imgur.com/dZoUBJK.jpg 45 DPS at 124km, your interceptor is dead in under a minute (55.5 seconds, yes I ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:34:35
|
96. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
M1k3y Koontz wrote: The inty ran away? Defense successful. Whats the problem? the interceptor did not die and is hitting a new structure
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:32:12
|
97. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Veskrashen wrote: Since the only significant advantage they have over cloaky nullfiied T3s is their <=2sec align time this just in signature radius and speed are not significant or advanta...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:31:23
|
98. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Acuma wrote: Seems mostly that only the goonies are afraid of trollceptors....... argumentum ad populum
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:29:26
|
99. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
God's Apples wrote: Think about it. To defend against 50 inties you need 3 celestises, a huginn, a lach, 3 guardians, and a couple long range dps (protei, legions, zealots, ishtars, etc). Remember that with the exception of the guardians, all ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:26:14
|
100. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: And the celestis isn't there to catch the interceptor, only to neutralize it. You don't have to destroy an opponent to inhibit them. the best part is where everyone has given up on the dream of trying to kill the in...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.09 22:21:07
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |